Gentoo Archives: gentoo-hardened

From: Stan Sander <stsander@×××××.net>
To: gentoo-hardened@l.g.o
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [gentoo-hardened] setools and libsemanage conflicting dependencies
Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2012 00:02:49
Message-Id: 50B93261.9070609@sblan.net
In Reply to: Fwd: Re: [gentoo-hardened] setools and libsemanage conflicting dependencies by Sven Vermeulen
1 On 11/30/2012 10:09 AM, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
2 >
3 > Nope it is correct. setools requires swig-1 whereas others require
4 > swig-2. The dependencies are build-only dependencies so in theory
5 > portage can downgrade/upgrade swig as needed.
6 >
7 > If you upgrade setools first and then @world, does that make it happy?
8 >
9 It was happy to do setools by itself before the world updates, but I
10 didn't actually run it. I instead masked the setools and ran world. I
11 then saw your message and unmasked setools and ran it by itself and it
12 happily downgraded swig and installed.
13
14 --
15 Stan & HD Tashi Grad 10/08 Edgewood, NM SWR
16 PR - Cindy and Jenny - Sammamish, WA NWR
17 http://www.cci.org