From: | Bill McCarty <bmccarty@××××××.net> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | Tad <tadglines@×××××××.net>, gentoo-hardened@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | RE: [gentoo-hardened] su command | ||
Date: | Tue, 13 Jan 2004 06:31:06 | ||
Message-Id: | 286721533.1073946521@[10.11.84.133] | ||
In Reply to: | RE: [gentoo-hardened] su command by Bill McCarty |
1 | Yup, staff_r works. I knew that <g>. |
2 | |
3 | Thanks immensely! |
4 | |
5 | --On Monday, January 12, 2004 10:25 PM -0800 Bill McCarty |
6 | <bmccarty@××××××.net> wrote: |
7 | |
8 | > Do you think I can get away with giving the user staff_r rather than |
9 | > sysadm_r? I'm going to try that first, on the theory that less is best |
10 | > <g>. |
11 | |
12 | --------------------------------------------------- |
13 | Bill McCarty |
14 | |
15 | -- |
16 | gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |