Gentoo Archives: gentoo-hardened

From: wabenbau@×××××.com
To: gentoo-hardened@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] Re: hardened clang
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 20:51:31
Message-Id: 20141223215058.01f72306@hal9000.localdomain
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-hardened] Re: hardened clang by Michael Orlitzky
1 Am Dienstag, 23.12.2014 um 15:07
2 schrieb Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o>:
3
4 > On 12/23/2014 02:30 PM, wabenbau@×××××.com wrote:
5 > >>
6 > >> are there any future plans for hardened clang?
7 > >
8 > > Is my question too unspecific or just too stupid for an answer? ;-)
9 > >
10 >
11 > Probably just that we don't want to send 100 "no" replies to the
12 > mailing list. You're stuck waiting for a "yes" instead. If you wait
13 > long enough without a "yes," that's a "no" =)
14 >
15
16 Ok. So I was just to impatient. THX for the answer.
17
18 Regards
19 wabe

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-hardened] Re: hardened clang Magnus Granberg <zorry@g.o>