1 |
> here I am :) I had a nice irc chat on #gentoo-hardened today. |
2 |
> I'm in touch with one of the irc people, it seems he can help |
3 |
> in debugging, otherwise I'll need some time to setup a |
4 |
> gentoo-hardened box (and read some docs). |
5 |
> |
6 |
> If somebody could file a detailed bug report I'll have a |
7 |
> starting point. |
8 |
|
9 |
ok, welcome on board then ;-). this |
10 |
|
11 |
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=109020239200001&r=1&w=2 |
12 |
|
13 |
is all i know myself plus some debugging i did here. from the strace |
14 |
report it seems that the problem is triggered after/while loading |
15 |
libsys_acpi.so which in turn makes me think that maybe some PIE |
16 |
code ended up in it and caused a problem. when i took a brief look |
17 |
at the compilation it seemed that most files were compiled with |
18 |
-fPIC which turns off PIE enforcement, but i haven't thoroughly |
19 |
checked all object files that were linked into this library, so |
20 |
something could have slipped in - this should be one of the first |
21 |
things to check out (alternatively you could just keep a non-PIE |
22 |
compiled .so around and use it with the PIE cpufreqd and see how |
23 |
that fares). |
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |