Gentoo Archives: gentoo-hardened

From: Michael Atighetchi <matighet@×××.com>
To: Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-hardened@l.g.o, gentoo-security@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] hardened-sources-2.6.x results.
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 17:47:04
Message-Id: 20040317174659.GF3372@bbn.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-hardened] hardened-sources-2.6.x results. by Ned Ludd
1 On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 08:20:31PM -0500, Ned Ludd wrote:
2 > hardened-dev-sources-2.6 is available for "testing"
3 >
4
5 <snip>
6
7 > Oh wait one more thing.. If you really care about security you probably
8 > should stick with 2.4.x
9 >
10
11 Could you explain more why you think 2.6 is "less" secure thatn 2.4 ?
12
13 Michael
14
15
16 > -peace
17 >
18
19
20
21 --
22 matighet@×××.com BBN Technologies
23
24 --
25 gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-hardened] hardened-sources-2.6.x results. Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>