From: | Michael Atighetchi <matighet@×××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> | ||
Cc: | gentoo-hardened@l.g.o, gentoo-security@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-hardened] hardened-sources-2.6.x results. | ||
Date: | Wed, 17 Mar 2004 17:47:04 | ||
Message-Id: | 20040317174659.GF3372@bbn.com | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-hardened] hardened-sources-2.6.x results. by Ned Ludd |
1 | On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 08:20:31PM -0500, Ned Ludd wrote: |
2 | > hardened-dev-sources-2.6 is available for "testing" |
3 | > |
4 | |
5 | <snip> |
6 | |
7 | > Oh wait one more thing.. If you really care about security you probably |
8 | > should stick with 2.4.x |
9 | > |
10 | |
11 | Could you explain more why you think 2.6 is "less" secure thatn 2.4 ? |
12 | |
13 | Michael |
14 | |
15 | |
16 | > -peace |
17 | > |
18 | |
19 | |
20 | |
21 | -- |
22 | matighet@×××.com BBN Technologies |
23 | |
24 | -- |
25 | gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-hardened] hardened-sources-2.6.x results. | Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |