1 |
Hi! |
2 |
|
3 |
Solars mail raised some questions for me. |
4 |
|
5 |
On tor, 2008-01-17 at 11:57 -0800, Ned Ludd wrote: |
6 |
|
7 |
> Of course there is the KQ overlay. For those who simply want basic |
8 |
> hardening that have no desire to wait for it to hit the tree. I'd |
9 |
> suggest just unmasking gcc-4, build it and then injecting some gcc |
10 |
> specs to handle it auto building hardened alike bins. |
11 |
> |
12 |
|
13 |
As I understand this KQ's overlay is just basic hardening? How does this |
14 |
differ (if it does) from solars first suggestion? |
15 |
|
16 |
Is the stuff hitting portage base on KQ's or will it be based on |
17 |
something diffrent (is KQ's worth toying with it or does it seem more |
18 |
like the final implementation can be something breaking it)? |
19 |
|
20 |
And is there any status of when it will hit portage (does not need to be |
21 |
a timeframe, more like if there are mayor problems to overcome in the |
22 |
implementation or if it is just a "minor" (maybe not that minor as the |
23 |
problems that can arise from it are not that minor) thing like concerns |
24 |
about breaking toolchain, or someone have not had the time to review it |
25 |
well enough)? |