Archives
Archives
| From: | Alex Efros <powerman@××××××××××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-hardened@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-hardened] hardened workstation - is that worth it? | ||
| Date: | Tue, 25 Nov 2008 20:57:03 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20081125205659.GO1806@home.power | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-hardened] hardened workstation - is that worth it? by "Javier Martínez" |
||
| 1 | Hi! |
| 2 | |
| 3 | On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 09:51:09PM +0100, Javier Martínez wrote: |
| 4 | > Benchmarks are very relative, one RSBAC system logging all |
| 5 | > READ/READ_OPEN requests made (granted or not) is something like a |
| 6 | > turtle. They depend how did you configure your system. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Yeah, that's true, I forget about RSBAC-like things when wrote about 2-5% |
| 9 | slowdown. My benchmarks was about GrSec + PaX + hardened toolchain, |
| 10 | without any access control systems like RSBAC or SeLinux. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | WBR, Alex. |