1 |
Why do you want to remove all rsbac related documentation?, I think is |
2 |
a non-sense to do this. Documentation does not harm anybody and in |
3 |
case of rsbac is almost nonexistent . |
4 |
|
5 |
I'm an rsbac user (maybe one of the last) and a gentoo hardened one, I |
6 |
have never used gentoo rsbac ebuilds, so for me is not any kind of |
7 |
change. |
8 |
Maybe you could put your opinion in the main page of the mandatory |
9 |
access controls related (something like rsbac is not longer maintained |
10 |
in gentoo so we suggest you to change to by this reason and this one |
11 |
and this one.... blahblahblah). |
12 |
|
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
2008/12/29 Gordon Malm <gengor@g.o>: |
16 |
> Hi all, |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Hardened Gentoo has been without an RSBAC maintainer for quite a long time |
19 |
> now. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Support for RSBAC in Hardened Gentoo is discontinued effective immediately. |
22 |
> RSBAC-related ebuilds, bugs and documents will begin being purged starting |
23 |
> January 31st, 2009. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> All users of RSBAC in Hardened Gentoo who require mandatory or role based |
26 |
> access control are strongly encouraged to migrate to Grsecurity's RBAC or |
27 |
> SELinux at this time. Anyone wishing to continue using RSBAC will be without |
28 |
> support from the Hardened Gentoo project. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> The RSBAC project itself continues as normal @ http://www.rsbac.org. |
31 |
> |
32 |
> Sincerely, |
33 |
> Gordon Malm (gengor) |
34 |
> |
35 |
> |