| 1 |
Just reading my previous post : What I wanted to say is " SMACK FAr less complicated that SElinux .. " ! |
| 2 |
Anyway yes, the suggestion of Anthony G. is a good start , I am maybe too much optimistic regarding SMACK , but it does not seem that complicated. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
________________________________ |
| 8 |
De : Anthony G. Basile <basile@××××××××××××××.edu> |
| 9 |
À : gentoo-hardened@l.g.o |
| 10 |
Envoyé le : Mercredi 4 septembre 2013 20h37 |
| 11 |
Objet : Re: [gentoo-hardened] Any help needed ? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
On 09/04/2013 08:03 AM, Zenon D'Elée wrote: |
| 15 |
> Hi Sven, SMACK seems very interesting and far more complicated than SELinux, what kind of implementation are you thinking about regarding SMACK ? |
| 16 |
> Anthony. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I would first figure out how to get SMACK working on a vanilla gentoo system manually and then figure out how to get portage (or other gentoo tools) to automate what you did manually. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- Anthony G. Basile, Ph. D. |
| 23 |
Chair of Information Technology |
| 24 |
D'Youville College |
| 25 |
Buffalo, NY 14201 |
| 26 |
(716) 829-8197 |
Archives