1 |
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 10:05:28AM -0500, Anthony G. Basile wrote: |
2 |
> Since the selinux policies come as a set with the same date as a version |
3 |
> number, wouldn't it be better to, say, remove all the 20080525 first. |
4 |
> Fix any brokenness, then deal with 20090730, etc until we've removed the |
5 |
> sets we want gone? |
6 |
|
7 |
I was first thinking of cleaning up everything except the latest 2.20101213 |
8 |
ebuilds, but if we remove any stable policy package and we have 1 user that |
9 |
has that stable package installed, then his next world update will fail. By |
10 |
not touching the latest stable ebuild (until the 2.20101213's stabilize) we |
11 |
at least are more confident that that won't happen. |
12 |
|
13 |
Wkr, |
14 |
Sven Vermeulen |