Gentoo Linux -- List Archive: gentoo-hardened

Installation:
Gentoo Handbook
Installation Docs

Documentation:
Home
Listing
About Gentoo
Philosophy
Social Contract

Resources:
Bug Tracker
Developer List
Discussion Forums
Gentoo BitTorrents
Gentoo Linux Enhancement Proposals
IRC Channels
Mailing Lists
Mirrors
Name and Logo Guidelines
Online Package Database
Security Announcements
Staffing Needs
Supporting Vendors
View our CVS

Graphics:
Logos and themes
Icons
ScreenShots

Miscellaneous Resources:
Gentoo Linux Store
Gentoo-hosted projects
IBM dW/Intel article archive

List Archive: gentoo-hardened

Navigation:

Lists: gentoo-hardened: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >

Headers:

To:	gentoo-hardened@g.o
From:	Krzysztof Kozłowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...>
Subject:	Re: [Selinux] Policy for Munin, ebuild + patch
Date:	Wed, 27 Jun 2007 16:53:18 +0200

Thanks for replies. I will modify the ebuild and submit to bugs.gentoo.org.


Chris PeBenito wrote:
> Yes, that is better, but the eclass change is the better long-term
> solution.

-- 
Krzysztof Kozłowski
http://www.kozik.net.pl


-- 
gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list

References:

[Selinux] Policy for Munin, ebuild + patch
-- Krzysztof Kozłowski

Re: [Selinux] Policy for Munin, ebuild + patch
-- Chris PeBenito

Re: [Selinux] Policy for Munin, ebuild + patch
-- Marek Wróbel

Re: [Selinux] Policy for Munin, ebuild + patch
-- Chris PeBenito

Navigation:

Lists: gentoo-hardened: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >

Previous by thread:

Re: [Selinux] Policy for Munin, ebuild + patch

Next by thread:

global_ssp boolean

Previous by date: