Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-hardened
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-hardened: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-hardened <gentoo-hardened@g.o>
From: Stan Sander <stsander@...>
Subject: refpolicy and Gentoo ebuilds
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 18:52:40 -0700
I've started poking around in the refpolicy source to help me learn
about the correct policy module style by looking at other examples. 
I've noticed that there are modules that get unpacked from the
selinux-base-policy ebuild (doing just the prepare step as in the Gentoo
docs) that don't seem to have their own e-build.  It's simple enough to
build these if I need them directly from this source, but I was curious
why some have e-builds and some don't.  Is it just a simple matter of no
one having stepped up yet and said here is an e-build for *foo*? 

-- 
Stan & HD Tashi Grad 10/08  Edgewood, NM  SWR
PR - Cindy and Jenny - Sammamish, WA  NWR
http://www.cci.org


Attachment:
signature.asc (OpenPGP digital signature)
Replies:
Re: refpolicy and Gentoo ebuilds
-- Sven Vermeulen
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-hardened: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Tin Hat 20111107 released.
Next by thread:
Re: refpolicy and Gentoo ebuilds
Previous by date:
Re: Grsec X11 Rbac Selinux Priviledged/Raw I/O Mprotect Firefox
Next by date:
Re: refpolicy and Gentoo ebuilds


Updated Jun 28, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-hardened mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.