Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Installation:
Gentoo Handbook
Installation Docs

Documentation:
Home
Listing
About Gentoo
Philosophy
Social Contract

Resources:
Bug Tracker
Developer List
Discussion Forums
Gentoo BitTorrents
Gentoo Linux Enhancement Proposals
IRC Channels
Mailing Lists
Mirrors
Name and Logo Guidelines
Online Package Database
Security Announcements
Staffing Needs
Supporting Vendors
View our CVS

Graphics:
Logos and themes
Icons
ScreenShots

Miscellaneous Resources:
Gentoo Linux Store
Gentoo-hosted projects
IBM dW/Intel article archive




List Archive: gentoo-hardened
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-hardened: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: method@g.o, gentoo-core@g.o, gentoo-hardened@g.o, gentoo-security@g.o
From: Toby Dickenson <tdickenson@...>
Subject: Re: The state of ebuild signing in portage
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 11:21:30 +0100
On Saturday 19 April 2003 7:40 am, Joshua Brindle wrote:

> Ideas and comments are welcome

Will there be provision for signing other entities in the portage rsync mirror 
other than ebuilds? eclasses, package.mask, etc. 

Will there be provision for controlling which developers are authorised to 
sign each package, or will portage allow any developer to sign any package 
manifest?

-- 
Toby Dickenson
http://www.geminidataloggers.com/people/tdickenson

--
gentoo-hardened@g.o mailing list

References:
The state of ebuild signing in portage
-- Joshua Brindle
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-hardened: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: The state of ebuild signing in portage
Next by thread:
Re: The state of ebuild signing in portage
Previous by date:
Re: The state of ebuild signing in portage
Next by date:
Re: The state of ebuild signing in portage


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Donate to support our development efforts.

Gentoo Centric Hosting: vr.org

VR Hosted

Tek Alchemy

Tek Alchemy

SevenL.net

SevenL.net

php|architect

php|architect

Copyright 2001-2007 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Email www@gentoo.org.