| 1 |
On 10/20/05, Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> > Aww... come on... I wanna vote somebody off the island. |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > Anyhow I think the minimal and the installer cd are the way to go. |
| 6 |
> > Perhaps if you just also release the source files you use to build the |
| 7 |
> > iso (I don't know what this would be, perhaps the catalyst file?) then |
| 8 |
> > people who desperately want to put together a KDE livecd or something |
| 9 |
> > like that could do it themselves. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Currently, much of the ISO generation is done manually. As for what is |
| 12 |
> done upto livecd-stage1, I have actually said many times how to |
| 13 |
> accomplish this. Take every package from the published "packagecd.spec" |
| 14 |
> for x86, add them to the end of "livecd-stage1.spec" and you're done. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> To use my spec files, you would need my hand-hacked copy of catalyst, |
| 17 |
> which is currently useless on anything but my machine, since it has tons |
| 18 |
> of hard-coded information (distcc hosts, paths, etc) that I have no |
| 19 |
> plans on sanitizing just to release, considering it is a modification |
| 20 |
> from catalyst 1.1.10.10 <http://1.1.10.10>, and the catalyst 1.x line has |
| 21 |
> reached EOL as we |
| 22 |
> are moving all development to catalyst 2.0, which will be capable of |
| 23 |
> building a LiveCD similar to mine. At that time, I'll release specs |
| 24 |
> designed for catalyst 2.0 for public consumption. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
Great... thats all I was curious about. I'm perfectly happy to let you make |
| 28 |
the CDs. Thanks for the answer Chris. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-Mike |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
________________________________ |
| 34 |
Michael E. Crute |
| 35 |
Software Developer |
| 36 |
SoftGroup Development Corporation |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Linux, because reboots are for installing hardware. |
| 39 |
"In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?" |
Archives