1 |
On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 13:34 -0700, Mike Rosset wrote: |
2 |
> mkisofs is really not hard to do Andrew I can do that, I have |
3 |
> requirements that need to emulate the installer cd. If I just needed |
4 |
> to make a custum cd catalyst is fine or the good old fasion way works |
5 |
> too. The point is your installer cd is useless since it cannot be |
6 |
> reproduced this makes it proprietary, thats not to say it doesnt work |
7 |
> as intended. |
8 |
|
9 |
*sigh* |
10 |
|
11 |
It can easily be reproduced by someone versed in catalyst. Go check out |
12 |
the catalyst mailing list to see lots of people making their own LiveCD |
13 |
images every day. Just because you don't want to take the time to learn |
14 |
catalyst does not make it my problem. |
15 |
|
16 |
As I have tried to explain to you countless times before, you simply |
17 |
would not be able to properly replicate the CD without my *exact* build |
18 |
environment. This means machine names (with proper distcc toolchains on |
19 |
the proper ports, etc) and all kinds of other really nasty stuff in the |
20 |
code that I don't feel like cleaning up. |
21 |
|
22 |
I *am* cleaning up this code for release, and it is called catalyst 2.0. |
23 |
|
24 |
Now, I've determined that you're nothing but a troll, so consider this |
25 |
my last response to your mails, as I don't feel the need to feed a |
26 |
troll. It just makes them keep coming back. |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Chris Gianelloni |
30 |
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead |
31 |
x86 Architecture Team |
32 |
Games - Developer |
33 |
Gentoo Linux |