Gentoo Archives: gentoo-installer

From: John Walsh <high@×××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-installer@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-installer] Gentoo installer vs current installation method, what about later?
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 18:28:50
Message-Id: 20051020182857.CC2E7CA0A3@ws5-11.us4.outblaze.com
Ok, but will the CD still ahve everything it had before, or will you be removing stuff to make 
room for X and all of that? If so, as I suspect, what will be taken out? Is there a place where 
people can look at what will be removed and maybe vote on what needs to stay?

Thanks,
Gabriel

----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Gaffney" <agaffney@g.o>
To: gentoo-installer@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-installer] Gentoo installer vs current installation method, what about later?
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 13:20:19 -0500

> > John Walsh wrote: > > But I like the non-X liveCD (not the minimal, the Universal), everybody has X > > livecd's and the simplicity and power of the current livecd is unmatched. > > Is there no way of keeping the same Universal LiveCD as is now > > for those users that > > prefer it? I mean, when a system is down, there is no need to > > start X and have open-office and x-chat, xine, mplayer, xmms, etc > > on the CD, but as many tools as possible, like it is now to get > > it back up. > > The universal basically is the minimal with some extras: > > universal == minimal + stages + portage snapshot > > You can easily bypass X on the X-LiveCD by passing 'nox' on the > kernel commandline. > > -- Andrew Gaffney http://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/ > Gentoo Linux Developer Installer Project > > -- gentoo-installer@g.o mailing list
-- _______________________________________________ Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox. Powered by Outblaze -- gentoo-installer@g.o mailing list

Replies