1 |
Kurt Lieber wrote: |
2 |
> Figure out where you want the directory and I'll be happy to create it. |
3 |
> Looking at our various top level categories, it doesn't really fit cleanly |
4 |
> into any of them. I'd suggest base as being the closest match. |
5 |
|
6 |
This is sticky. I don't have an opinion either way about it as long as |
7 |
it's not branded a desktop or server subproject so as to alienate either |
8 |
group. |
9 |
|
10 |
>>- Get a code repository going. Since non-devs may (as in "might," not |
11 |
>>"can") participate in actual development, the repository may need to be |
12 |
>>hosted on non-Gentoo servers. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> This is something I would object to. If this is an official Gentoo project |
15 |
> (which I assume it is) that we're going to let official Gentoo users |
16 |
> eventually user (which I assume we are) then we need to ensure that it's |
17 |
> developed on secure infrastructure, etc. |
18 |
|
19 |
Not a problem. That's why I threw that out as something to discuss. I |
20 |
wasn't sure what our policies were on things such as this. Right now, I |
21 |
think all those that would be writing code (and therefore need CVS |
22 |
commit access) are Gentoo devs (or soon to be). |
23 |
|
24 |
>>- Decide to what level non-devs should participate (mainly, can they |
25 |
>>commit code) |
26 |
> |
27 |
> I vote no. :) |
28 |
|
29 |
A fair vote. If there is an inroad to them becoming devs, that's fine. I |
30 |
just didn't want to see good coders turned away. |
31 |
|
32 |
>>- Complete high(er) level design documents that all devs agree on. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> Good luck. :) |
35 |
|
36 |
Heh. Yea, well... we can try. ;) |
37 |
|
38 |
-- |
39 |
Eric Sammer |
40 |
Gentoo Linux |
41 |
http://www.gentoo.org |