| 1 |
Kurt Lieber wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 10:20:00AM -0400 or thereabouts, Walter White wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>>I think we should be able to change it to work with portage and the ebuild |
| 7 |
>>scripts. We still should be able to utilize the power of the ebuild |
| 8 |
>>scripts, we just need to sit down and think how that can be done. The |
| 9 |
>>installer there is just a rough idea of what we could do. I won't be able |
| 10 |
>>to jump on IRC, I am at work, and no IRC... |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
>I think Corey's point was that we already have an active installer project |
| 15 |
>underway at the moment. I personally don't see a need to start work on a |
| 16 |
>second installer when the first one hasn't even been finalized. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
>--kurt |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
Wouldn't it reduce the time of the project if we at least had a look at |
| 22 |
the installer? I've had a look and installed with it a while ago out of |
| 23 |
curiosity and although its not ideal its certainly a work in progress. |
| 24 |
Just bin the RPM base. lol |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
George |
Archives