Gentoo Archives: gentoo-installer

From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>
To: gentoo-installer@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-installer] Gentoo installer vs current installation method, what about later?
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 20:57:22
Message-Id: 1129841845.11559.62.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-installer] Gentoo installer vs current installation method, what about later? by Mike Rosset
1 On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 13:34 -0700, Mike Rosset wrote:
2 > mkisofs is really not hard to do Andrew I can do that, I have
3 > requirements that need to emulate the installer cd. If I just needed
4 > to make a custum cd catalyst is fine or the good old fasion way works
5 > too. The point is your installer cd is useless since it cannot be
6 > reproduced this makes it proprietary, thats not to say it doesnt work
7 > as intended.
8
9 *sigh*
10
11 It can easily be reproduced by someone versed in catalyst. Go check out
12 the catalyst mailing list to see lots of people making their own LiveCD
13 images every day. Just because you don't want to take the time to learn
14 catalyst does not make it my problem.
15
16 As I have tried to explain to you countless times before, you simply
17 would not be able to properly replicate the CD without my *exact* build
18 environment. This means machine names (with proper distcc toolchains on
19 the proper ports, etc) and all kinds of other really nasty stuff in the
20 code that I don't feel like cleaning up.
21
22 I *am* cleaning up this code for release, and it is called catalyst 2.0.
23
24 Now, I've determined that you're nothing but a troll, so consider this
25 my last response to your mails, as I don't feel the need to feed a
26 troll. It just makes them keep coming back.
27
28 --
29 Chris Gianelloni
30 Release Engineering - Strategic Lead
31 x86 Architecture Team
32 Games - Developer
33 Gentoo Linux

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature