| 1 |
Andrew Gaffney schrieb: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Norman Rieß wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> Donnie Berkholz schrieb: |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>>> |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>>> The portage team just got rid of exactly this capability for creating |
| 10 |
>>> difficult to reproduce USE flag setups, because they were dynamic, |
| 11 |
>>> based |
| 12 |
>>> on what's installed rather than set unconditionally in make.conf. |
| 13 |
>>> |
| 14 |
>>> So it's a difficult argument to say we should re-add it into the |
| 15 |
>>> installer. |
| 16 |
>>> |
| 17 |
>>> Thanks, |
| 18 |
>>> Donnie |
| 19 |
>>> |
| 20 |
>>> |
| 21 |
>>> |
| 22 |
>> Why difficult to reproduce? Same software should create same USE-flag |
| 23 |
>> settings. |
| 24 |
>> I find it a little funny, that an official installer installes a |
| 25 |
>> perhaps not working system "by default". |
| 26 |
>> I think that misses the point of an installer! |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> USE flags control optional stuff. If something doesn't work because of |
| 30 |
> a missing USE flag, that's a bug with that particular ebuild. |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
Ok, than let it miss, don´t set it wrong! |
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
gentoo-installer@g.o mailing list |
Archives