Gentoo Archives: gentoo-installer

From: Andrew Gaffney <agaffney@g.o>
To: gentoo-installer@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-installer] version 0.3 of the Gentoo Linux Installer
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:21:00
Message-Id: 4404B07E.4040406@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-installer] version 0.3 of the Gentoo Linux Installer by "Norman Rieß"
1 Norman Rieß wrote:
2 > Donnie Berkholz schrieb:
3 >
4 >>
5 >>
6 >> The portage team just got rid of exactly this capability for creating
7 >> difficult to reproduce USE flag setups, because they were dynamic, based
8 >> on what's installed rather than set unconditionally in make.conf.
9 >>
10 >> So it's a difficult argument to say we should re-add it into the
11 >> installer.
12 >>
13 >> Thanks,
14 >> Donnie
15 >>
16 >>
17 >>
18 > Why difficult to reproduce? Same software should create same USE-flag
19 > settings.
20 > I find it a little funny, that an official installer installes a perhaps
21 > not working system "by default".
22 > I think that misses the point of an installer!
23
24 USE flags control optional stuff. If something doesn't work because of a missing
25 USE flag, that's a bug with that particular ebuild.
26
27 --
28 Andrew Gaffney http://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/
29 Gentoo Linux Developer Installer Project
30
31 --
32 gentoo-installer@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-installer] version 0.3 of the Gentoo Linux Installer "Norman Rieß" <norman@×××××××××.org>