On 10/20/05, <b class="gmail_sendername">Andrew Gaffney</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:agaffney@g.o">agaffney@g.o</a>&gt; wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">

Michael Crute wrote:<br>&gt; On 10/20/05, *Mike Rosset* &lt;<a href="mailto:schizoid29@...">schizoid29@...</a><br>&gt; &lt;mailto:<a href="mailto:schizoid29@...">schizoid29@...</a>&gt;&gt; wrote:<br>

&gt;<br>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; I've all ready asked for those and got shot down appartently Chris<br>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; wont release them. Also Chris will try to bump this to another list<br>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; releng, more then likely<br>&gt;<br>&gt;<br>
&gt; Why not release them? Is this not open source? What's so secret about an
<br>&gt; iso image?<br><br>Let's not start this again. It comes down to this:<br><br>* they are a work in progress, constantly changing<br>* they don't work with the released version of catalyst<br></blockquote></div><br>

OK, fine, thats good enough for me. I dont want to start some war between Chris and Mike. <br>
<br>Another idea though, why not patch catalyst so they work and
release them. For pete sake people this is open source, must we bicker
about &quot;proprietary&quot; shit? In any case I am perfectly happy with the
minimal CD as it is now, I'm more curious than anything about these
secret spec files.<br>
<br>
-Mike<br clear="all"><br>-- <br>________________________________<br>Michael E. Crute<br>Software Developer<br>SoftGroup Development Corporation<br><br>Linux, because reboots are for installing hardware.<br>
&quot;In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?&quot;