Gentoo Archives: gentoo-installer

From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>
To: gentoo-installer@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-installer] Gentoo installer vs current installation method, what about later?
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 20:36:56
Message-Id: 1129840581.11559.47.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-installer] Gentoo installer vs current installation method, what about later? by Michael Crute
1 On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 16:16 -0400, Michael Crute wrote:
2 > On 10/20/05, Mike Rosset <schizoid29@×××××.com> wrote:
3 > I've all ready asked for those and got shot down appartently
4 > Chris wont release them. Also Chris will try to bump this to
5 > another list releng, more then likely
6 >
7 > Why not release them? Is this not open source? What's so secret about
8 > an iso image?
9
10 Ehh... I'm not releasing it because it won't work for you. It's really
11 that simple. When I was working on the ISO, rather than doing things
12 "right" and extensible, I did them "quick and dirty". I added
13 hard-coded paths. I changed pieces of code that I know will break other
14 things. Besides this, I *still* have to do manual intervention in some
15 places to get things to work.
16
17 Basically, if I took a dump in a bag and gave it to you, you'd get about
18 as much use out of it. If you want to look at my turd, at least let me
19 polish it for you.
20
21 Also, there's nothing "open source" about the spec files used to build a
22 CD. While catalyst is released under the GPL, and the individual
23 packages are released under some open source license or another, the
24 actual spec files aren't under any license until I release them. The
25 *only* reason that they get released is because of the general open
26 nature of Gentoo, not because of any licensing requirement. Basically,
27 they get released because I want to release them. At any rate, as I've
28 stated a few times (thanks for the troll, Mike!) already, I'll release
29 proper spec files after the release of catalyst 2.0, once there is
30 actually something that makes the spec files usable. Until that time,
31 you can consider the spec files under the FWO (For Wolf Only) license.
32 If you want to peek at them, I'll fax you a NDA for you to sign after
33 you send me the check for a FWO license... :P
34
35 I could release what I have right now, but you wouldn't understand how
36 it works, since they would not work with any released version of
37 catalyst. They wouldn't even work with catalyst 2.0 from CVS. My spec
38 files work *only* on my *one* workstation that I've been using to build
39 the LiveCD on, simply because I was lazy and under a lot of pressure to
40 produce the CD in a very limited amount of time and have no interest to
41 spend countless hours cleaning it up just so I can release it in its
42 current ugly state. Most of the code has already been pushed into
43 catalyst 2.0 CVS, but there's still a few patches I have to add before
44 that goes out for release.
45
46 --
47 Chris Gianelloni
48 Release Engineering - Strategic Lead
49 x86 Architecture Team
50 Games - Developer
51 Gentoo Linux

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies