From: | Nathaniel McCallum <npmccallum@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-installer@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-installer] New class diagram and use case | ||
Date: | Tue, 03 Feb 2004 22:16:54 | ||
Message-Id: | 1075846608.12132.10.camel@luther.natemccallum.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-installer] New class diagram and use case by Paul de Vrieze |
1 | On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 17:03, Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
2 | > I find an after-the-fact interference idea to be quite unnatural. Another |
3 | > option would be to feed the backend two xml files which basically have null |
4 | > actions such that they complement eachoter. Such a solution however would be |
5 | > suboptimal to me |
6 | |
7 | I don't understand why this is unnatural. Could you develop a case |
8 | scenario what would warrant the pausing? Personally, I would prefer |
9 | hooks for user defined scripts (between stages). |
10 | |
11 | Nathaniel |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-installer] New class diagram and use case | Dan Armak <danarmak@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-installer] New class diagram and use case | Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o> |