Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 17:03, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> I find an after-the-fact interference idea to be quite unnatural. Another
> option would be to feed the backend two xml files which basically have null
> actions such that they complement eachoter. Such a solution however would be
> suboptimal to me
I don't understand why this is unnatural. Could you develop a case
scenario what would warrant the pausing? Personally, I would prefer
hooks for user defined scripts (between stages).
Nathaniel
|
| Attachment: |
|
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part)
|
|
