List Archive: gentoo-installer
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
Well we seem to have different opinions about installers and have to
> I'm sorry, but I feel I must weigh in here...
> This entire thread is pointless, since the list of available USE flags
> depends entirely on what portage tree is used, and the installer cannot
> know that until the install has already started.
> Having said that, the installer was *not* written to make installation
> easier for the user, but instead to make the process automated, to allow
> for mass deployments and such. Any user-friendliness you may be
> experiencing is simply a result of an effort on the developers' part to
> make it as easy on system administrators as possible.
> As far as the issue of reading the documentation goes, I agree with
> Oddball; those who can't or aren't willing to read the manual should not
> be using Gentoo. No matter how much you may want it to, a single
> distribution can't fit everybody perfectly. If a distribution tries to
> accommodate everyone, it will tend to die. That's just a fact of life.
> Deal with it.
> On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 14:03 -0800, Revrend Oddball wrote:
>> but this would sort of sidestep the entire point of gentoo..
>> from what i understand gentoo has always been about giving a user all
>> options and the documentation to learn and act on their own. if you do
>> not wish
>> to follow this base idea then go with something else like suse or
>> the rule of thumb i have always gone with if i dont know what an option
>> is then
>> i leave it the heck alone or read the manual to find out what it is.
>> its not like they make it hard to get a list of what the use flags are.
>> instead of making them go away simply make a to the manual on use flags.
>> suggesting to the user to rtfm but ultimately the idea is to read the
> firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list
email@example.com mailing list