Gentoo Archives: gentoo-java

From: Alistair Bush <alistair.bush@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-java@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-java] Feature Request: Binary Java packages instead of bytecode
Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2006 13:32:28
Message-Id: 200610090231.22645.alistair.bush@gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-java] Feature Request: Binary Java packages instead of bytecode by Rene Bartsch
1 On Monday 09 October 2006 02:15, Rene Bartsch wrote:
2 > Hi,
3 >
4 > running Java bytecode in an VM is quite slow but compiling Java in
5 > host-optimized binaries would improve performance a lot.
6 >
7 > Because of that I want to propose a use-flag "java-binary" causing
8 > additional functions in the java eclasses to compile the ebuilds in
9 > host-optimized binary code.
10 >
11 > Have Phun with Gentoo
12 >
13 > Renne
14
15 Renne. I suggest that you look at the java upgrade guide and also at
16
17 http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/java/wiki/GCJ_as_a_JDK
18
19 Basically as a summary.
20
21 the new java system that is in the process of being rolled out (plan is to
22 only have it in ~arch for 1 more week). This system will allow a user (such
23 as yourself) to choose the jdk they would like to build their java packages.
24 This includes selecting GCJ as you jdk. So hopefully and eventually once GCJ
25 becomes stable enough the whole process of compiling java to machine code
26 will be in the stable tree.
27
28 Therefore. a use flag isn't needed :) in fact the java team is in the
29 process of removing the jikes use flag for this very reason
30
31 Alistair
32 --
33 gentoo-java@g.o mailing list