Gentoo Archives: gentoo-java

From: "Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog)" <fordfrog@g.o>
To: gentoo-java@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-java] Re: java-dep-check on ant tasks
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 01:44:32
Message-Id: 4D4613DF.2030305@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-java] Re: java-dep-check on ant tasks by Vlastimil Babka
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dne 31.1.2011 02:14, Vlastimil Babka napsal(a):
> On 01/19/2011 04:03 PM, "Miroslav ©ulc (fordfrog)" wrote: >> hi, >> >> i was looking at the issues when some classes cannot be found via >> DEPENDS, like http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=298689. the problem >> is that DEPENDS for ant tasks does not contain dependency on ant-core. >> this patch below could fix it (at least it fixed the issue for me and >> testing some junit ant tasks while emerging packages with >> FEATURES="test" worked too): > > This could work for ant-tasks themselves, but not for everything else > that has ant-core dependency, such as when a package provides some ant > task. In that case, the depending classes are needed only when invoked > from within ant, in which case they are already on classpath. > Registering as dependency would make ant put on classpath in all cases > the package is used. > The bottom line is, there should be a way to exclude stuff (such as ant > classes) in java-dep-check.
well, imo there is a question when to exclude and when not, talking generally, not just about ant classes.
> > BTW, the mailing list is better than the java alias for this. Seems to > get much less spam as I see it :) > > Vlastimil
miroslav -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk1GE94ACgkQB6q7Q15RwyDA8ACggSjonL0CUxL1zfKOA7zB8E/m nI4Anjocpsd1vVs6H4gQVQarblYJSFrN =N6u7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-java] Re: java-dep-check on ant tasks Alistair Bush <ali_bush@g.o>