Gentoo Archives: gentoo-java

From: Alistair Bush <ali_bush@g.o>
To: gentoo-java@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-java] Assigning out QA work.
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:31:01
Message-Id: 497D66AB.90306@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-java] Assigning out QA work. by Fabian Groffen
1 Fabian Groffen wrote:
2 > On 26-01-2009 17:49:45 +1300, Alistair Bush wrote:
3 >> Please find attached the output of repoman over java-experimental. I
4 >> was only able to achieve this after a few modifications to portage trunk
5 >> (http://rafb.net/p/NknPVL65.html). There are a few things to be aware of.
6 >>
7 >> 1) I haven't got a clue whether it actually works. I would actually
8 >> like ppl to confirm that it does/discover where it doesn't
9 >> 2) Im interested to know what doesn't work, but im not actually
10 >> expecting those patches to be the final implementation. This is
11 >> something that _just seems to work_. Therefore don't be surprised if
12 >> nothing more comes of this. Hopefully these patches work in all
13 >> situations but they may not requiring a far more invasive
14 >> implementation. I have no experience with the portage codebase so I
15 >> doubt I could do that implementation.
16 >>
17 >> The patch will be posted to gentoo-dev.
18 >
19 > before you do, it might make sense to remove the hardcoded reference to
20 > your overlay on your disk ;)
21
22 #Im hardcoding this as I haven't a clue how to figure out
23 #path of overlay based on repo_name without doing it manually and im am
24 lazy.
25 #currently only supports 1 level of master, should be updated to handle
26 arbitary number
27 #of parents and parent parents.
28
29 :P
30
31 >
32 > zmedico is usually quite open for patches, but I guess you need to make
33 > it a little bit more generic than it is now.
34 >
35 > My 0.02
36 >
37 >
38 >