1 |
Fabian Groffen wrote: |
2 |
> On 26-01-2009 17:49:45 +1300, Alistair Bush wrote: |
3 |
>> Please find attached the output of repoman over java-experimental. I |
4 |
>> was only able to achieve this after a few modifications to portage trunk |
5 |
>> (http://rafb.net/p/NknPVL65.html). There are a few things to be aware of. |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> 1) I haven't got a clue whether it actually works. I would actually |
8 |
>> like ppl to confirm that it does/discover where it doesn't |
9 |
>> 2) Im interested to know what doesn't work, but im not actually |
10 |
>> expecting those patches to be the final implementation. This is |
11 |
>> something that _just seems to work_. Therefore don't be surprised if |
12 |
>> nothing more comes of this. Hopefully these patches work in all |
13 |
>> situations but they may not requiring a far more invasive |
14 |
>> implementation. I have no experience with the portage codebase so I |
15 |
>> doubt I could do that implementation. |
16 |
>> |
17 |
>> The patch will be posted to gentoo-dev. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> before you do, it might make sense to remove the hardcoded reference to |
20 |
> your overlay on your disk ;) |
21 |
|
22 |
#Im hardcoding this as I haven't a clue how to figure out |
23 |
#path of overlay based on repo_name without doing it manually and im am |
24 |
lazy. |
25 |
#currently only supports 1 level of master, should be updated to handle |
26 |
arbitary number |
27 |
#of parents and parent parents. |
28 |
|
29 |
:P |
30 |
|
31 |
> |
32 |
> zmedico is usually quite open for patches, but I guess you need to make |
33 |
> it a little bit more generic than it is now. |
34 |
> |
35 |
> My 0.02 |
36 |
> |
37 |
> |
38 |
> |