Re: [gentoo-java] Re: Bugs submission

[Joshua Nichols]

Vincent Schut wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 01:02:48 +0200, Joshua Nichols
> <nichoj-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@××××××××××××.org> wrote:
>
>> Wiktor Wandachowicz wrote:
>>> Miroslav Šulc <miroslav.sulc@...> writes:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> where should we submit bugs related to migration overlay? Should we
>>>> use
>>>> bugs.gentoo.org?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'm afraid that the b.g.o maintainers wouldn't like it much...
>>> Maybe there should be some thread / page in the javaexperimental trac?
>>> (and I don't think that posting it here is best, I was corrected once)
>>>
>>> But on the other hand, some METABUG in b.g.o shouldn't be a problem,
>>> like the jdk-1.5 METABUG maybe? And the maintainers should know
>>> about it
>>> beforehand, so they wouldn't dismiss such reports as INVALID or
>>> WONTFIX.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> I actually don't think using bugs.gentoo.org would be too bad.
>> Although, it would be preferred if bugs directly to
>> java-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@××××××××××××.org, so we don't drive
>> bug-wranglers crazy. To this end, I made a 'bookmarkable template'
>> and setup a tinyurl for it:
>>
>> *http://tinyurl.com/ofzha*
>>
>> Please use this for reporting migration-related bugs. It should be
>> preset to be assigned to
>> java-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@××××××××××××.org, block the migration
>> bug, and will have [migration-overlay] in the title.
>
> I tried using the tinyurl link to file a bug about tomcat (bug nr.
> 127949), but I think it still went to the normal bug-wranglers. See
> the following reply
> I got:
>
> Display all headersSubject: [Bug 127949] [migration-overlay]
> tomcat-5.5.16 works for amd64
> To: schut@×××××××××.nl
> From: bugzilla-daemon@g.o
> Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:05:09 +0000
>
> --------- start forward ---------
> Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127949
> Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127949
>
>
> jakub@g.o changed:
>
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                  CC|                            |java@g.o
>              Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
>          Resolution|                            |UPSTREAM
>
>
>
>
> ------- Comment #1 from jakub@g.o  2006-03-29 01:05 PST -------
> Hmmmm, better ask the people who run the overlay...
>
>
> --Configure bugmail: http://bugs.gentoo.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
> --------- end forward ---------

Well, first, the bug you filed really doesn't have anything to do with 
the migration overlay (because it's from the experimental overlay). That 
being said, I was working on keywording it around the time you filed it, 
and should be fixed.

As for why it got assigned to bug-wranglers... I think there's an issue 
with bugzilla where you can't switch between simple and expert modes for 
filing bug. I suspect that this happened with the upgrade a bit back, 
and you're stuck with whatever mode you were using at that time. The 
feature for assigning directly to someone (ie java@g.o) is one of 
the features from expert, so this would explain why it didn't take effect.

So, I'll try to have a word with the bug wranglers to make sure these 
don't get resolved this way.

- Josh
-- 
gentoo-java@g.o mailing list