Gentoo Archives: gentoo-java

From: Joshua Nichols <nichoj@g.o>
To: Vincent Schut <schut@×××××××××.nl>
Cc: gentoo-java@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-java] Re: Bugs submission
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 16:31:47
Message-Id: 44314DBF.3010304@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-java] Re: Bugs submission by Vincent Schut
Vincent Schut wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 01:02:48 +0200, Joshua Nichols > <nichoj-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@××××××××××××.org> wrote: > >> Wiktor Wandachowicz wrote: >>> Miroslav Šulc <miroslav.sulc@...> writes: >>> >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> where should we submit bugs related to migration overlay? Should we >>>> use >>>> bugs.gentoo.org? >>>> >>>> >>> >>> I'm afraid that the b.g.o maintainers wouldn't like it much... >>> Maybe there should be some thread / page in the javaexperimental trac? >>> (and I don't think that posting it here is best, I was corrected once) >>> >>> But on the other hand, some METABUG in b.g.o shouldn't be a problem, >>> like the jdk-1.5 METABUG maybe? And the maintainers should know >>> about it >>> beforehand, so they wouldn't dismiss such reports as INVALID or >>> WONTFIX. >>> >>> >>> >> I actually don't think using bugs.gentoo.org would be too bad. >> Although, it would be preferred if bugs directly to >> java-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@××××××××××××.org, so we don't drive >> bug-wranglers crazy. To this end, I made a 'bookmarkable template' >> and setup a tinyurl for it: >> >> *http://tinyurl.com/ofzha* >> >> Please use this for reporting migration-related bugs. It should be >> preset to be assigned to >> java-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@××××××××××××.org, block the migration >> bug, and will have [migration-overlay] in the title. > > I tried using the tinyurl link to file a bug about tomcat (bug nr. > 127949), but I think it still went to the normal bug-wranglers. See > the following reply > I got: > > Display all headersSubject: [Bug 127949] [migration-overlay] > tomcat-5.5.16 works for amd64 > To: schut@×××××××××.nl > From: bugzilla-daemon@g.o > Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:05:09 +0000 > > --------- start forward --------- > Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127949 > Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127949 > > > jakub@g.o changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > CC| |java@g.o > Status|NEW |RESOLVED > Resolution| |UPSTREAM > > > > > ------- Comment #1 from jakub@g.o 2006-03-29 01:05 PST ------- > Hmmmm, better ask the people who run the overlay... > > > --Configure bugmail: http://bugs.gentoo.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. > --------- end forward ---------
Well, first, the bug you filed really doesn't have anything to do with the migration overlay (because it's from the experimental overlay). That being said, I was working on keywording it around the time you filed it, and should be fixed. As for why it got assigned to bug-wranglers... I think there's an issue with bugzilla where you can't switch between simple and expert modes for filing bug. I suspect that this happened with the upgrade a bit back, and you're stuck with whatever mode you were using at that time. The feature for assigning directly to someone (ie java@g.o) is one of the features from expert, so this would explain why it didn't take effect. So, I'll try to have a word with the bug wranglers to make sure these don't get resolved this way. - Josh -- gentoo-java@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-java] Re: Bugs submission Vincent Schut <schut@×××××××××.nl>