Gentoo Archives: gentoo-java

From: Alistair Bush <alistair.bush@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-java@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-java] Re: JNI and java versions
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 12:40:40
Message-Id: 44CB570A.2020401@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-java] JNI and java versions by David Herron
1 David Herron wrote:
2 >
3 > The JNI documentation is here:
4 >
5 > Java 5: http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/jni/index.html Java
6 > 6: http://download.java.net/jdk6/docs/technotes/guides/jni/index.html
7 >
8 > The 1.5 release notes are here:
9 >
10 > Java 5: http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/relnotes/features.html
11 > Java 6: http://java.sun.com/javase/6/webnotes/features.html
12 Thanks for the ref's
13 >
14 >
15 > On a quick perusal it looks like the last changes to the JNI API
16 > happened in 1.2 ...??
17 >
18 > Do you see some incompatibilities today? If so we'll want to hear
19 > about any.
20 >
21 I personally haven't come across any. I am actually in the slow process
22 of trying to create an ebuild for JOGL. As this uses JNI I started to
23 wonder about the effect changes to JNI would have on the package and how
24 something like this could be managed within the portage system. I would
25 imagine that this could be a difficult problem for a disto like gentoo.
26 > - David Herron
27 >
28 >
29 >
30 >
31 > Alistair Bush wrote:
32 >> I am just wondering about a few questions and how they could effect
33 >> gentoo's java packages.
34 >>
35 >> Manly this can be answer by...
36 >> Is the JNI interface stable between 1.4, 1.5 and 1.* versions?
37 >>
38 >> If the JNI isn't stable is there anything that we can do to provide a
39 >> transparent solution?
40 >>
41 >> Alistair
42 >
43
44 --
45 gentoo-java@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-java] Re: JNI and java versions Joshua Nichols <nichoj@g.o>