1 |
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, 2006-02-19 at 17:57 +0100, Jan Riedel wrote: |
3 |
>> i think it's not necessary to make an own ebuild for mod_proxy_ajp. the |
4 |
>> best way would be an new use-flag for apache-2.2.0 to enable the option |
5 |
>> "--enable-proxy-ajp" during configure and the module mod_proxy_ajp.so |
6 |
>> would be built. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> So is it bundled then with Apache? Would seem so if one could |
9 |
> build/compile it as part of the Apache build/compile processes. |
10 |
> |
11 |
yes it's bundled with apache-2.2.0 |
12 |
|
13 |
> If that is the case, then the ability to build or not would fall on the |
14 |
> team/herd responsible for Apache. |
15 |
> |
16 |
|
17 |
i only wanted to refer to the start of this thread from michael vince...: |
18 |
<quote> |
19 |
My main problems are there is not a full set of choices of Apache that |
20 |
being just 1.3.x or Apache 2.0.x and no Apache 2.2.x. |
21 |
Apache 2.2.x has some great new features like a built in AJP module for |
22 |
linking Tomcat and Apache together with out needing the external mod_ajp |
23 |
module. |
24 |
</quote> |
25 |
|
26 |
...and tell him that apache2.2.0 is now in portage and that the module |
27 |
mod_proxy_ajp is not beeing built by default and there is a problem with |
28 |
apr and the useflag "ipv6". |
29 |
i didn't want the gentoo java team to care about this. |
30 |
sorry for the misunderstanding. |
31 |
|
32 |
btw., is there any newsgroup for gentoo and apache related |
33 |
information/problems? |
34 |
|
35 |
regards, |
36 |
jan |
37 |
-- |
38 |
gentoo-java@g.o mailing list |