Gentoo Archives: gentoo-java

From: Krzysiek Pawlik <nelchael@g.o>
To: Gentoo Java <gentoo-java@l.g.o>
Subject: [gentoo-java] jdom hell
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 10:17:07
Message-Id: 44E19EFE.6080002@gentoo.org
1 Keywords for dev-java/jdom:
2
3 | a a a h i m m p p p s s s x x
4 | l m r p a 6 i p p p 3 h p 8 8
5 | p d m p 6 8 p c c c 9 a 6 6
6 | h 6 a 4 k s 6 - 0 r -
7 | a 4 4 m c f
8 | a b
9 | c s
10 | o d
11 | s
12 --------------+------------------------------
13 1.0_beta6 | ~ +
14 1.0_beta9-r1 | + + + + +
15 1.0_beta10-r3 | + ~ + +
16 1.0 | + + + +
17
18 Nightmare... Some packages require beta9, others require beta10, and the
19 last set requires 1.0. My proposal: SLOT for 1.0 => "1.0" (instead of
20 ${PV}), fix packages requiring <1.0, and drop all versions below 1.0 -
21 two requirements:
22
23 * ppc64 has to stabilize 1.0
24 * patches for:
25 - dev-db/jxtray
26 - <=dev-java/jaxen-1.1_beta6
27 - dev-java/werken-xpath
28 - dev-java/velocity
29 - dev-java/commons-jxpath
30 - dev-util/fujaba
31
32 After that fix all {R,}DEPEND to be "dev-java/jdom-1.0*".
33
34 --
35 Krzysiek Pawlik <nelchael at gentoo.org> key id: 0xBC555551
36 desktop-misc, desktop-dock, desktop-wm, x86, java, apache...

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature