1 |
Keywords for dev-java/jdom: |
2 |
|
3 |
| a a a h i m m p p p s s s x x |
4 |
| l m r p a 6 i p p p 3 h p 8 8 |
5 |
| p d m p 6 8 p c c c 9 a 6 6 |
6 |
| h 6 a 4 k s 6 - 0 r - |
7 |
| a 4 4 m c f |
8 |
| a b |
9 |
| c s |
10 |
| o d |
11 |
| s |
12 |
--------------+------------------------------ |
13 |
1.0_beta6 | ~ + |
14 |
1.0_beta9-r1 | + + + + + |
15 |
1.0_beta10-r3 | + ~ + + |
16 |
1.0 | + + + + |
17 |
|
18 |
Nightmare... Some packages require beta9, others require beta10, and the |
19 |
last set requires 1.0. My proposal: SLOT for 1.0 => "1.0" (instead of |
20 |
${PV}), fix packages requiring <1.0, and drop all versions below 1.0 - |
21 |
two requirements: |
22 |
|
23 |
* ppc64 has to stabilize 1.0 |
24 |
* patches for: |
25 |
- dev-db/jxtray |
26 |
- <=dev-java/jaxen-1.1_beta6 |
27 |
- dev-java/werken-xpath |
28 |
- dev-java/velocity |
29 |
- dev-java/commons-jxpath |
30 |
- dev-util/fujaba |
31 |
|
32 |
After that fix all {R,}DEPEND to be "dev-java/jdom-1.0*". |
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
Krzysiek Pawlik <nelchael at gentoo.org> key id: 0xBC555551 |
36 |
desktop-misc, desktop-dock, desktop-wm, x86, java, apache... |