| 1 |
You can attach it here: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115506 |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
-- |
| 4 |
Miroslav |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Yannick Menager wrote: |
| 7 |
> Actually i have an ebuild for geronimo, but it's a binary-based one. |
| 8 |
> Should i contribute so that there's something until someone write a |
| 9 |
> source one ? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Alistair Bush wrote: |
| 12 |
>> Jose That does sound interesting. |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> At present all J2EE activity is towards trying to package JBoss on |
| 15 |
>> Gentoo (sanely). Geronimo is on the list of J2EE implementations |
| 16 |
>> that we (fordforg and myself) are planing on looking at. |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> If you would like to attempt to package Geronimo we would be happy go |
| 19 |
>> give you advice, either thru the mailing list or on |
| 20 |
>> irc://freenode/#gentoo-java |
| 21 |
>> |
| 22 |
>> (The above is a blantant attempt to get more worker ants for the J2EE |
| 23 |
>> effort). |
| 24 |
>> |
| 25 |
>> I personally was considering attempting to package the glassfish |
| 26 |
>> project after jboss but I may now consider Geronimo (or do them jointly) |
| 27 |
>> |
| 28 |
>> |
| 29 |
>> Alistair |
Archives