Gentoo Archives: gentoo-java

From: Roy Wright <royw@×××××.com>
To: Joshua Nichols <nichoj@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-java@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-java] ecj javac target/source build.xml rewriting
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 22:01:46
Message-Id: 472657EA.4050606@cisco.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-java] ecj javac target/source build.xml rewriting by Joshua Nichols
1 Joshua Nichols wrote:
2 >
3 > If the values of source/target are causing issues with ecj, it should
4 > be reported to upstream. Using a patch until it gets fixed would be
5 > acceptable in this case.
6 >
7 > If it's just an issue on Gentoo, it's worth looking at patching
8 > xml-rewrite to allow values to be forced, like with a --force flag or
9 > something similar. This shouldn't be a default behavior (definitely
10 > not initially at least) due to the large number of ebuilds (stable or
11 > otherwise) already using xml-rewrite's behavior as is.
12 >
13
14 Thank you for the background. Patching the build.xml for ecj does allow
15 ant-core to compile.
16 But I'm hitting the same symptom now when trying to compile
17 concurrent-util. So I'm currently
18 trying to find how the "custom" build.xml is being pulled into the build
19 so it can be patched too.
20
21 Thank you,
22 Roy
23
24 --
25 gentoo-java@g.o mailing list