| 1 |
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 01:02:48 +0200, Joshua Nichols |
| 2 |
<nichoj-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@××××××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Wiktor Wandachowicz wrote: |
| 5 |
>> Miroslav Šulc <miroslav.sulc@...> writes: |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>>> Hi, |
| 9 |
>>> |
| 10 |
>>> where should we submit bugs related to migration overlay? Should we use |
| 11 |
>>> bugs.gentoo.org? |
| 12 |
>>> |
| 13 |
>>> |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> I'm afraid that the b.g.o maintainers wouldn't like it much... |
| 16 |
>> Maybe there should be some thread / page in the javaexperimental trac? |
| 17 |
>> (and I don't think that posting it here is best, I was corrected once) |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> But on the other hand, some METABUG in b.g.o shouldn't be a problem, |
| 20 |
>> like the jdk-1.5 METABUG maybe? And the maintainers should know about it |
| 21 |
>> beforehand, so they wouldn't dismiss such reports as INVALID or WONTFIX. |
| 22 |
>> |
| 23 |
>> |
| 24 |
>> |
| 25 |
> I actually don't think using bugs.gentoo.org would be too bad. Although, |
| 26 |
> it would be preferred if bugs directly to |
| 27 |
> java-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@××××××××××××.org, so we don't drive |
| 28 |
> bug-wranglers crazy. To this end, I made a 'bookmarkable template' and |
| 29 |
> setup a tinyurl for it: |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> *http://tinyurl.com/ofzha* |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> Please use this for reporting migration-related bugs. It should be |
| 34 |
> preset to be assigned to java-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@××××××××××××.org, |
| 35 |
> block the migration bug, and will have [migration-overlay] in the title. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
I tried using the tinyurl link to file a bug about tomcat (bug nr. |
| 38 |
127949), but I think it still went to the normal bug-wranglers. See the |
| 39 |
following reply |
| 40 |
I got: |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
Display all headersSubject: [Bug 127949] [migration-overlay] tomcat-5.5.16 |
| 43 |
works for amd64 |
| 44 |
To: schut@×××××××××.nl |
| 45 |
From: bugzilla-daemon@g.o |
| 46 |
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:05:09 +0000 |
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
--------- start forward --------- |
| 49 |
Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127949 |
| 50 |
Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127949 |
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
jakub@g.o changed: |
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
What |Removed |Added |
| 56 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 57 |
CC| |java@g.o |
| 58 |
Status|NEW |RESOLVED |
| 59 |
Resolution| |UPSTREAM |
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
|
| 62 |
|
| 63 |
|
| 64 |
------- Comment #1 from jakub@g.o 2006-03-29 01:05 PST ------- |
| 65 |
Hmmmm, better ask the people who run the overlay... |
| 66 |
|
| 67 |
|
| 68 |
-- |
| 69 |
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.gentoo.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email |
| 70 |
------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- |
| 71 |
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. |
| 72 |
--------- end forward --------- |
| 73 |
|
| 74 |
Cheers, |
| 75 |
Vincent. |
| 76 |
|
| 77 |
> |
| 78 |
> Regards, |
| 79 |
> Josh |
| 80 |
|
| 81 |
|
| 82 |
|
| 83 |
-- |
| 84 |
gentoo-java@g.o mailing list |
Archives