1 |
On 14-05-2007 12:06:30 +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: |
2 |
> > What do you think? |
3 |
> |
4 |
> I'm for LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Or as compromise, append both LD_ and JAVA_ |
5 |
> variables. That way one can set additional paths for java without |
6 |
> affecting everything else. |
7 |
|
8 |
The only problem I see here is that LD_LIBRARY_PATH is something that |
9 |
may be called DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH or SHLIBS_PATH on different platforms. |
10 |
Additionally, it should be unset in normal use, as it is considered |
11 |
harmful. JAVA_LIBRARY_PATH feels better for this reason, and can be |
12 |
safely injected in the environment, if neccesary. |
13 |
|
14 |
Just my 2 cents. |
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
-- |
18 |
Fabian Groffen |
19 |
Gentoo on a different level |
20 |
-- |
21 |
gentoo-java@g.o mailing list |