Gentoo Archives: gentoo-java

From: Vincent Schut <schut@×××××××××.nl>
To: Joshua Nichols <nichoj@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-java@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-java] Re: Bugs submission
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 11:29:29
Message-Id: op.s7hd7c1oxn96lv@localhost
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-java] Re: Bugs submission by Joshua Nichols
On Mon, 03 Apr 2006 18:30:55 +0200, Joshua Nichols <nichoj@g.o>  
wrote:

> Vincent Schut wrote: >> On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 01:02:48 +0200, Joshua Nichols >> <nichoj-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@××××××××××××.org> wrote: >> >>> Wiktor Wandachowicz wrote: >>>> Miroslav Šulc <miroslav.sulc@...> writes: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> where should we submit bugs related to migration overlay? Should we >>>>> use >>>>> bugs.gentoo.org? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> I'm afraid that the b.g.o maintainers wouldn't like it much... >>>> Maybe there should be some thread / page in the javaexperimental trac? >>>> (and I don't think that posting it here is best, I was corrected once) >>>> >>>> But on the other hand, some METABUG in b.g.o shouldn't be a problem, >>>> like the jdk-1.5 METABUG maybe? And the maintainers should know about >>>> it >>>> beforehand, so they wouldn't dismiss such reports as INVALID or >>>> WONTFIX. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> I actually don't think using bugs.gentoo.org would be too bad. >>> Although, it would be preferred if bugs directly to >>> java-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@××××××××××××.org, so we don't drive >>> bug-wranglers crazy. To this end, I made a 'bookmarkable template' and >>> setup a tinyurl for it: >>> >>> *http://tinyurl.com/ofzha* >>> >>> Please use this for reporting migration-related bugs. It should be >>> preset to be assigned to java-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@××××××××××××.org, >>> block the migration bug, and will have [migration-overlay] in the >>> title. >> >> I tried using the tinyurl link to file a bug about tomcat (bug nr. >> 127949), but I think it still went to the normal bug-wranglers. See the >> following reply >> I got: >> >> Display all headersSubject: [Bug 127949] [migration-overlay] >> tomcat-5.5.16 works for amd64 >> To: schut@×××××××××.nl >> From: bugzilla-daemon@g.o >> Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:05:09 +0000 >> >> --------- start forward --------- >> Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127949 >> Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127949 >> >> >> jakub@g.o changed: >> >> What |Removed |Added >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> CC| |java@g.o >> Status|NEW |RESOLVED >> Resolution| |UPSTREAM >> >> >> >> >> ------- Comment #1 from jakub@g.o 2006-03-29 01:05 PST ------- >> Hmmmm, better ask the people who run the overlay... >> >> >> --Configure bugmail: http://bugs.gentoo.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email >> ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- >> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. >> --------- end forward --------- > > Well, first, the bug you filed really doesn't have anything to do with > the migration overlay (because it's from the experimental overlay). That > being said, I was working on keywording it around the time you filed it, > and should be fixed.
Ah, sorry. I assumed they belonged together. Could someone please tell me then how/where to file bugs regarding the experimental overlay? Vincent.
> > As for why it got assigned to bug-wranglers... I think there's an issue > with bugzilla where you can't switch between simple and expert modes for > filing bug. I suspect that this happened with the upgrade a bit back, > and you're stuck with whatever mode you were using at that time. The > feature for assigning directly to someone (ie java@g.o) is one of > the features from expert, so this would explain why it didn't take > effect. > > So, I'll try to have a word with the bug wranglers to make sure these > don't get resolved this way. > > - Josh
-- gentoo-java@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-java] Re: Bugs submission Joshua Nichols <nichoj@g.o>