1 |
On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 16:37 -0500, Joshua Nichols wrote: |
2 |
> Over this past weekend, I put migration-overlay into the main tree: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> Everything related to it is currently sitting in package.mask: |
5 |
|
6 |
Thanks for doing this, and for the E-mail update. I've been noticing |
7 |
the changes in migration-overlay this weekend. :-) |
8 |
|
9 |
FYI: For some reason (at least in my mail client) some extra chars |
10 |
(like this: "> ") appear at the beginning of a few lines in your list |
11 |
(below). Folks should be aware that certain packages won't be visible |
12 |
unless they remove these extra characters from the front of the |
13 |
applicable lines. |
14 |
|
15 |
The corrected list should appear something like this: |
16 |
|
17 |
#---------------------------------------- |
18 |
# Joshua Nichols<nichoj@g.o> (24 Jun 2006) |
19 |
# Masked for testing changes to Java |
20 |
>=dev-java/java-config-1.3 |
21 |
dev-java/java-config-wrapper |
22 |
>dev-java/javatoolkit-0.1.0 |
23 |
>=dev-java/ant-core-1.6.5-r13 |
24 |
>=dev-java/ant-tasks-1.6.5-r2 |
25 |
>=dev-java/jikes-1.22-r12 |
26 |
>=dev-java/eclipse-ecj-3.1-r13 |
27 |
=dev-java/blackdown-jdk-1.3.1-r23 |
28 |
=dev-java/blackdown-jdk-1.4.1-r12 |
29 |
=dev-java/blackdown-jdk-1.4.2.03-r12 |
30 |
=dev-java/blackdown-jre-1.3.1-r20 |
31 |
=dev-java/blackdown-jre-1.4.1-r12 |
32 |
=dev-java/blackdown-jre-1.4.2.03-r11 |
33 |
=dev-java/ibm-jdk-bin-1.4.2.04-r10 |
34 |
=dev-java/ibm-jdk-bin-1.5.0-r11 |
35 |
=dev-java/ibm-jre-bin-1.4.2.05 |
36 |
=dev-java/jrockit-jdk-bin-1.4.2.10 |
37 |
=dev-java/jrockit-jdk-bin-1.5.0.06 |
38 |
=dev-java/kaffe-1.1.7 |
39 |
=dev-java/sun-jdk-1.4.2.12 |
40 |
=dev-java/sun-jdk-1.5.0.07 |
41 |
=dev-java/sun-jre-bin-1.4.2.12 |
42 |
=dev-java/sun-jre-bin-1.5.0.07 |
43 |
#--------------------------------------- |
44 |
|
45 |
Another note: You list sun-jdk-1.5.0.07 and my system does have it |
46 |
installed (it appeared in migration-overlay a week or two ago). |
47 |
However, the ebuild appears to have been deleted from the overlay and it |
48 |
is NOT anywhere in the main Portage tree. Unless you still need to add |
49 |
it something must have gone wrong. Just FYI... |
50 |
|
51 |
|
52 |
> I would like to unmask these packages in the next few days. At that |
53 |
> point, I'd like to 'officially' announce it, as in put it on the front |
54 |
> page, send to -announce, etc. |
55 |
|
56 |
Sounds good to me. They seem to be working well so my vote is "the |
57 |
sooner the better". |
58 |
|
59 |
Thanks again for all of the hard work! |
60 |
|
61 |
~ Greg T. |