| 1 |
Le 22/05/2011 07:38, Kasun Gajasinghe a écrit : |
| 2 |
> Hi all, |
| 3 |
> I'm working on getting Apache Maven in to work by building from |
| 4 |
> source. Currently, in main tree, Maven is installed using the binary |
| 5 |
> (dev-java/maven-bin), which is against the Gentoo Java Packaging |
| 6 |
> Policy. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Getting Maven in to work by building-from-source is a lengthy process. |
| 9 |
> We have two main versions to go ahead. The 2.x range with the latest |
| 10 |
> being v2.2.1, and the 3.x range with the latest being v3.0.3. The |
| 11 |
> compatibility notes for 2.x and 3.x are at [1]. There's only few |
| 12 |
> compatibility issues as I've seen. I was thinking to go with 2.x since |
| 13 |
> in my experience and the area where I was involved in, haven't had any |
| 14 |
> plans to migrate to Maven 3.x soon. But the overall picture may vary. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> So, I'm asking from the Gentoo's Java community, what's the suitable |
| 17 |
> version to go with? 2.x or 3.x |
| 18 |
Hi, i'm a gentoo user and java developper using maven for |
| 19 |
years. I also known the maven gentoo problem ;) |
| 20 |
So i'll be happy to help you or test your work. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
For maven 2/3, 3.x is a new achitecture intended to |
| 23 |
be maven 2 complaint. So, i vote for 3.x. |
| 24 |
But maybe 3.x is too young... |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Éric Chatellier <chatellier@×××××××××.com> |
| 28 |
Tel: 02.40.50.29.28 |
| 29 |
http://www.codelutin.com |
Archives