| 1 |
David Emmett wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sunday 07 January 2007 18:01, Vlastimil Babka wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Looks like they already closed it wontfix, because the project is dead. |
| 5 |
>> Kinda what I expected. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Which rather begs the question: why do we need mockobjects to emerge groovy? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
Because it really is a dependency of groovy. Groovy provides support for |
| 11 |
using mock objects, see: |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
http://groovy.codehaus.org/Groovy+Mocks |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
A better question would be why doesn't upstream use a different |
| 16 |
implementation of mock objects, that has a less dead upstream, like |
| 17 |
jmock or easymock. Both of those have had releases in the past, whereas |
| 18 |
mockobjects hasn't had a release since 2003. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Joshua Nichols |
| 22 |
Gentoo/Java Project Lead |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-java@g.o mailing list |
Archives