| 1 |
OK, I'll get them into migrated-java-experimental-overlay and I'll also |
| 2 |
update the bug. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
-- |
| 5 |
Miroslav |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Yannick Menager wrote: |
| 8 |
> I just tried to do so, but i can't seem to be able to logon to |
| 9 |
> bugzilla, even resetted the password, but it won't allow logon |
| 10 |
> *sigh*... Could someone please take the files directly from my |
| 11 |
> overlay at https://svn.jguild.com/gentoo-overlay/www-servers/geronimo/ |
| 12 |
> and put them on bugzilla |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Miroslav S wrote: |
| 15 |
>> You can attach it here: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115506 |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> -- |
| 18 |
>> Miroslav |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
>> Yannick Menager wrote: |
| 21 |
>> |
| 22 |
>>> Actually i have an ebuild for geronimo, but it's a binary-based one. |
| 23 |
>>> Should i contribute so that there's something until someone write a |
| 24 |
>>> source one ? |
| 25 |
>>> |
| 26 |
>>> Alistair Bush wrote: |
| 27 |
>>> |
| 28 |
>>>> Jose That does sound interesting. |
| 29 |
>>>> |
| 30 |
>>>> At present all J2EE activity is towards trying to package JBoss on |
| 31 |
>>>> Gentoo (sanely). Geronimo is on the list of J2EE implementations |
| 32 |
>>>> that we (fordforg and myself) are planing on looking at. |
| 33 |
>>>> |
| 34 |
>>>> If you would like to attempt to package Geronimo we would be happy go |
| 35 |
>>>> give you advice, either thru the mailing list or on |
| 36 |
>>>> irc://freenode/#gentoo-java |
| 37 |
>>>> |
| 38 |
>>>> (The above is a blantant attempt to get more worker ants for the J2EE |
| 39 |
>>>> effort). |
| 40 |
>>>> |
| 41 |
>>>> I personally was considering attempting to package the glassfish |
| 42 |
>>>> project after jboss but I may now consider Geronimo (or do them |
| 43 |
>>>> jointly) |
| 44 |
>>>> |
| 45 |
>>>> |
| 46 |
>>>> Alistair |
| 47 |
>>>> |
Archives