Gentoo Archives: gentoo-java

From: Caster <cast3r@××××××.cz>
To: gentoo-java <gentoo-java@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-java] Feedback on migration and experimental overlay
Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 11:00:10
Message-Id: 44607634.90607@seznam.cz
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-java] Feedback on migration and experimental overlay by Joshua Nichols
1 Joshua Nichols wrote:
2 > Ah... right. It's not a problem that 1.5 is being used to compile it.
3 > The build.xml files get rewritten to make sure 1.4 bytecode gets compiled.
4 >
5 > By chance, have you configured anything in
6 > /etc/java-config-2/build/compilers.conf ? By default, it should use the
7 > lowest possible VM, but it can be configured more finely.
8 >
9 > Josh
10
11 No, didn't change that. It has only the commented example line
12 #COMPILERS="ecj-3.1 jikes javac"
13 I don't see how to specify JDK version in there :)
14 This is getting confusing, you have generation-1 system VM, generation-2
15 system VM, this compilers.conf... Any docs that explain how all that
16 works, what gets used where? :)
17 And what means "Enabling generation-2 compatibility ..." line in some
18 ebuilds? BTW those ebuilds then use jdk-1.4 while ant-core doesn't print
19 this line and uses jdk-1.5...
20
21 Seems ant-tasks is affected as well, and can't be built because of that.
22 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132764
23
24 Caster
25
26 P.S. Um why doesn't this list have reply-to header pointing to the list
27 address...
28
29 --
30 gentoo-java@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-java] Feedback on migration and experimental overlay Joshua Nichols <nichoj@g.o>