Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-java
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-java: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: Gentoo Java <gentoo-java@g.o>
From: Robert Burrell Donkin <robertburrelldonkin@...>
Subject: Re: Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 11:58:18 +0100
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Kasun Gajasinghe <kasunbg@...> wrote:
> Hi Jörg, and Robert,
>
>>> FWIW one unresolved challenge for linux distributions with the rise of
>>> bytecode languages (such as Java) is that compressed bytecodes are not
>>> binaries in the usual sense (platform dependent machine executable
>>> machine code). i know that it's a hard thing for the linux community
>>> to hear but it's about time that the community acknowledged that these
>>> languages are now mainstream and stop trying to force them into a
>>> inappropriate provisioning model.
>
> So... what exactly are you suggesting? Switch in to using binaries
> instead of building from source paradigm?

i love the "build-from-source" paradigm but dependencies for languages
such as Java are distributed as compressed intermediate bytecode
source not binaries. bytecode dependencies work quite differently from
the libraries used by directly compiled languages. building
applications in a reliable and reproducable way for bytecode languages
requires provisioning libraries in native source form (ie. bytecode).

it's time to start working with these new languages rather than try to
fight them by forcing them to fit into inappropriate structures.

>> To build Maven from source in Gentoo I wonder about the hen-and-egg problem.
>
> Yes. To Bootstrap maven, the work around for this is by: first
> generate ANT build.xml via `mvn ant:ant`. maven-bin will provide the
> mvn command in this case. Then patch that build.xml to the source.
> After that, ANT will take care of the building from source.

not very reliable :-/

- robert


References:
Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
-- Kasun Gajasinghe
Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
-- Eric Chatellier
Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
-- Petteri Räty
Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
-- Kasun Gajasinghe
Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
-- Petteri Räty
Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
-- Kasun Gajasinghe
Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
-- Petteri Räty
Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
-- Kasun Gajasinghe
Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
-- Robert Burrell Donkin
Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
-- Jörg Schaible
Re: Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
-- Kasun Gajasinghe
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-java: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
Next by thread:
Re: Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
Previous by date:
Re: Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
Next by date:
Re: Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?


Updated Mar 06, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-java mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.