Gentoo Archives: gentoo-java

From: Kasun Gajasinghe <kasunbg@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-java@l.g.o
Cc: Kiorky <kiorky@××××××××××.net>, Serkan Kaba <serkan@g.o>, ali_bush@g.o
Subject: [gentoo-java] Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 05:39:08
Message-Id: BANLkTinQJuauWU=j+O5ZY2cAy6mdJpoHtA@mail.gmail.com
1 Hi all,
2 I'm working on getting Apache Maven in to work by building from
3 source. Currently, in main tree, Maven is installed using the binary
4 (dev-java/maven-bin), which is against the Gentoo Java Packaging
5 Policy.
6
7 Getting Maven in to work by building-from-source is a lengthy process.
8 We have two main versions to go ahead. The 2.x range with the latest
9 being v2.2.1, and the 3.x range with the latest being v3.0.3. The
10 compatibility notes for 2.x and 3.x are at [1]. There's only few
11 compatibility issues as I've seen. I was thinking to go with 2.x since
12 in my experience and the area where I was involved in, haven't had any
13 plans to migrate to Maven 3.x soon. But the overall picture may vary.
14
15 So, I'm asking from the Gentoo's Java community, what's the suitable
16 version to go with? 2.x or 3.x?
17
18 [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/MAVEN/maven-3x-compatibility-notes.html
19
20 PS: Development will be carried out at the gsoc-maven-overlay which is
21 based on the java-overlay.
22 http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/java/browser/gsoc-maven-overlay
23
24 Thanks,
25 --Kasun
26
27 --
28 ~~~*******'''''''''''''*******~~~
29 Kasun Gajasinghe,
30 University of Moratuwa,
31 Sri Lanka.
32 Blog: http://kasunbg.blogspot.com
33 Twitter: http://twitter.com/kasunbg

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-java] Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ? kiorky <kiorky@××××××××××.net>
Re: [gentoo-java] Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ? Eric Chatellier <chatellier@×××××××××.com>