Gentoo Archives: gentoo-java

From: "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: gentoo-java@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-java] Re: [gentoo-dev] browserplugin vs. nsplugin
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 19:07:53
Message-Id: 435547F1.5000507@gentoo.org
1 Thomas Matthijs wrote:
2 > * Aron Griffis (agriffis@g.o) wrote:
3 >
4 >>Back in July the Java team proposed fixing its ebuilds to respect the
5 >>USE=browserplugin instead of USE=mozilla, a worthwhile change. During
6 >>the course of the discussion, it became clear that the existing
7 >>USE=nsplugin was more appropriate.
8 >>
9 >>http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-dev@l.g.o/msg02898.html
10 >>
11 >>Unfortunately the discussion stagnated and the Java team went ahead
12 >>with their original suggestion.
13 >>
14 >>At this point I think it would still be worthwhile to repair these
15 >>ebuilds to respect USE=nsplugin and drop the browserplugin from
16 >>use.local.desc. Comments?
17 >
18 >
19 > We had discussed it prior and then nobody seemed to object to
20 > browserplugin, only after we changed it.
21 >
22 > You have the java herd's blessing to go ahead and change it.
23 > Please announce it to gentoo-java@ aswell when you make the change.
24 >
25
26 I discussed a possible solution to the problem with axxo the other day.
27 Basically we should remove all the use flags and make java-config able
28 to configure the java plugin.
29
30 In the meanwhile feel free to rename the USE flags, but you can of
31 course help the java team by improving =java-config-2.0* and adding
32 support for plugin configuring.
33
34 Regards,
35 Petteri

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature