-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Caster wrote:
> Joshua Nichols wrote:
>> Indeed. I mostly want to make sure everything got into place fine. So...
>> to help with this, I ask everyone try re-merging the packages formally
>> in the overlay (now in the package.mask), to make sure all the distfiles
>> and packages are there, and that the system continues to work.
>>
> 
> Missing ebuilds in the tree (checked also
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-java/ and not there
> either, so I guess not rsync lag problem?)
> 
> dev-java/ant-tasks-1.6.5-r2
> ibm-jdk-bin 1.4.2.05 and 1.5.0.02 (were my bumps bad?) - the existing
> 1.5.0-r11 has broken digest because IBM changed the files (bug 130533)

Whoops. Was sitting uncommitted in my tree. Should be fixed in CVS, and
will take a bit to propogate.

> Missing distfile/wrong version? of java-config-wrapper (bug 138015)

Fixed in CVS too.

> I think many people get the whole migration stuff pulled just because
> they used java 1.5 faq to have 1.5 VM with generation-1. It tells you to
> # echo "=dev-java/sun-jdk-1.5*" >> /etc/portage/package.unmask
> which overrides your package.mask for 1.5.0.07 which then tries to pull
> everything... Well at least more testers for us :)

That's what you get for using package.mask stuff without using precise
verion atoms :-D
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEn8jz8ATTzZyw6sMRAvMnAJ4l3QXChk5qzRvuNGaU0ai/T1PP1wCdF119
8nfXHsTq6KlLKoTgWKQQ6/E=
=Vx1p
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
gentoo-java@g.o mailing list