Gentoo Archives: gentoo-java

From: "Jörg Schaible" <joerg.schaible@×××.de>
To: gentoo-java@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-java] Re: Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ?
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 16:27:11
Message-Id: irluts$1dd$1@dough.gmane.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-java] Re: Re: Maven from source - version 2.x or 3.x ? by "Jörg Schaible"
1 Jörg Schaible wrote:
2
3 > Kasun Gajasinghe wrote:
4 >
5 >> Hi Jörg, and Robert,
6 >>
7 >>>> FWIW one unresolved challenge for linux distributions with the rise of
8 >>>> bytecode languages (such as Java) is that compressed bytecodes are not
9 >>>> binaries in the usual sense (platform dependent machine executable
10 >>>> machine code). i know that it's a hard thing for the linux community
11 >>>> to hear but it's about time that the community acknowledged that these
12 >>>> languages are now mainstream and stop trying to force them into a
13 >>>> inappropriate provisioning model.
14 >>
15 >> So... what exactly are you suggesting? Switch in to using binaries
16 >> instead of building from source paradigm?
17 >
18 > For Java: Yes. Use flags are still useful for dropping optional deps. I
19 > recommended that already years ago.
20
21 I really meant years ...
22 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.java/43
23
24 - Jörg