| 1 |
On 08-01-2008 19:13:53 +1300, Alistair Bush wrote: |
| 2 |
> > would it be possible to do it like we do it in Portage? |
| 3 |
> > |
| 4 |
> > sys.path.insert(0, os.path.join(os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(os.path. realpath(__file__))), "pym")) |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > that would do the "magic" for prefix as well as that it makes |
| 7 |
> > development for you a bit easier maybe. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> How about we just remove it, my plan was to have all modules in |
| 11 |
> site_packages, which negates this? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
If it is in standard python locations, then it works well for everybody, |
| 14 |
yes. Much appreciated if you would do so. Thanks! |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 19 |
Gentoo on a different level |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-java@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives