List Archive: gentoo-java
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 4/20/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Vlastimil Babka</b> <<a href="mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org">email@example.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Krzysiek Pawlik wrote:<br>> Petteri Räty wrote:<br>>>> I propose to deprecate ejavac and remove it in gen3 - writting build.xml files<br>>>> is very easy, so I don't see any reason why not to do so for few packages still
<br>>>> using ejavac:<br>>> Well is there any compelling reason not to support it? Works fine and<br>>> does what it is supposed to.<br>><br>> IMVHO it's a hack to not write a build.xml, you have to run ejavac, then jar,
<br>> eventually javadoc - why? Isn't it easier (and less error prone) to do it in<br>> build.xml?<br><br>I don't agree it's hack. I think it's easier to write few lines in<br>ebuild than writing build.xml
which needs ant dependency, takes space in<br>FILESDIR and in the end does exactly the same thing.</blockquote><div><br> </div></div>Caster: ++<br><br>