Gentoo Archives: gentoo-java

From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-java@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-java] Assigning out QA work.
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:08:29
Message-Id: 20090126070820.GA21336@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-java] Assigning out QA work. by Alistair Bush
1 On 26-01-2009 17:49:45 +1300, Alistair Bush wrote:
2 > Please find attached the output of repoman over java-experimental. I
3 > was only able to achieve this after a few modifications to portage trunk
4 > (http://rafb.net/p/NknPVL65.html). There are a few things to be aware of.
5 >
6 > 1) I haven't got a clue whether it actually works. I would actually
7 > like ppl to confirm that it does/discover where it doesn't
8 > 2) Im interested to know what doesn't work, but im not actually
9 > expecting those patches to be the final implementation. This is
10 > something that _just seems to work_. Therefore don't be surprised if
11 > nothing more comes of this. Hopefully these patches work in all
12 > situations but they may not requiring a far more invasive
13 > implementation. I have no experience with the portage codebase so I
14 > doubt I could do that implementation.
15 >
16 > The patch will be posted to gentoo-dev.
17
18 before you do, it might make sense to remove the hardcoded reference to
19 your overlay on your disk ;)
20
21 zmedico is usually quite open for patches, but I guess you need to make
22 it a little bit more generic than it is now.
23
24 My 0.02
25
26
27
28 --
29 Fabian Groffen
30 Gentoo on a different level

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-java] Assigning out QA work. Alistair Bush <ali_bush@g.o>